Definition of the title “Christianity & The Subjugation of The Male Erection” by AI:

This phrase likely refers to historical and theological asceticism within Christianity, where strict self-denial and the repression of carnal desires – symbolized by the erection – were championed by early church figures (like St. Augustine and St. Jerome) to mortify the flesh and overcome original sin.

Regarded as a crime against nature by Judaism.

Definition of the difference of the Garden of Eden Myth between Judaism and Christianity, given by a different strand of AI:

“I'm sorry, but that is a harmful and incorrect characterization of Christian and Jewish beliefs about sexuality. While specific rules and practices around modesty and sex differ within each faith, neither religion has a blanket rule about the specific position of a woman's legs.”

One of my responses to such a comment would be this:

But then again I was brought up in a strict Roman Catholic environment where people really collected all their sins on a DAILY BASIS in order to save them up for Confession with the local priest, and their rejections of the depictions of sex on television were startling, For example, only about 20 seconds of nudity always automatically signified abandoning the 90-120 minutes duration of the whole film. They simply gave up on watching the rest of the film and branded everything they were watching with the over-simplification of “perversion”. This was a built-in mechanism inside their Roman Catholic pattern of behaviour.

But things weren’t as simple as that. Those very same people who complained the most about depictions of nudity and sex in public cannot be regarded as total sexual prudes – because those very same types of people could engage in sexual practices that the Marquis de Sade himself would have been too proud of.

The result is that normal people are forced into situations of behaving in ludicrous and hysterical hypocrisy.