It's no good writing thousands upon thousands of words just copying stuff from the Bible and pretending it's all “research” – because people have known for a long time that little can be corroborated found in the Bible from independent evidence.

Quickly getting to the point:

* No archaeological evidence that the stories of Joseph the son of Jacob as told in the Old Testament are factual.

* Ditto – anything said about the stuff found in the New Testament. For example, we know that Pontius Pilate really existed, but not Jesus Christ, especially since there is nothing from Christian documents themselves dating from the first century about a historical Jesus Christ. Historians and Theologians have placed their faith in the document “Q” but they cannot say with certainty if it dates from the first century – or whether or not the words found in “Q” are really those of Jesus Christ.

That's the trouble with “Rennies”, they all need to go back to the drawing-board to find out about critical research, or else they will be copying things like the “Jack The Ripper” Diaries, or even worse still “The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail”!