The work called “Circuit” – just like “Le Serpent Rouge” – is a typical Priory of Sion load of rubbish with the expressed intention to both dumbfound and to amaze the gullible believer. It serves absolutely no other purpose. To put things into context, Philippe de Chérisey died in 1985, Pierre Plantard died in 2000 and Gérard de Sède died in 2004 – with all three of those personalities potentially providing input into this piece of haphazard garbage. Despite all of this, there are still people today in 2025 writing tens of thousands of words about this absolute joke in a scientific and technical way. From 1989 and the dawning of the third version of the Priory of Sion, Pierre Plantard claimed that he was the sole author of “Circuit” (and that Philippe de Chérisey only took credit for).

It should also be noted that there are also different and contradictory versions of “Circuit” presented in the typical style of the Priory of Sion (with the usual intention to both dumbfound and to amaze the gullible). For example, those people who are attracted to things like Christian Rosencreutz would be instantly attracted to it.

“Circuit” was also written with the express intention to provide a decipherment of the Large Parchment (that can only be solved by its creator, and the said parchment does not really have a “decipherment” in the usual sense of the word).

“Circuit” contains references to all the usual chestnuts – Rennes-le-Château, Mary Magdalene, Treasure, Mystery – as well as to the vital facets of alluding to a Great Secret that does not really exist – but nevertheless tantalises researchers and the gullible (especially the latter) into believing that a treasure, a secret, and a mystery literally exists in the real world – the very fabric that is contained in all of the works and the letters of the Priory of Sion.

The Rennes-le-Château and Priory of Sion aficionado is quite unable to keep quiet for too long – because their addiction keeps bubbling up every so often to such a vast degree that they eventually need to constantly express themselves in the form of articles and “research” (so-called) to mark the fulfilment of their inner CASUALTY.